People have different views about whether or not zoos should be prohibited. While zoos sometimes may badly treat animals, I believe that they can effort to conserve endangered species.
One the one hand, in some zoos animals are preserving in non-standard cages. Indeed, providing adequate enclosures for large animals such as elephants and giraffes is very expensive and in practice it is impossible. For instance, in our city zoo, an elephant is placed in a small enclosure, there are no trees and no other elephants. Therefore, this elephant seems bored and certainly would have shorter life span. Moreover, regarding expenses, zoos are not able to provide enough space for all animals in their captive environment. For example, eagles cannot fly in any kinds of enclosures. Hence, these animals would not have suitable circumstances similar to their habitat.
On the other hand, I would argue that zoos seem to be crucial for conserving the species that are susceptible to become extinct. For example, giant panda is one the most well-known endangered species that is protecting in zoos across the world. Zoos not only provide an appropriate enclosure for them, but also they implement a human-controlled breeding situation for pandas to increase their population. Moreover, deforestation as a legacy of increasing human population leads to disappearing animal’s natural habitat. Therefore, conserving animals in zoos in one of the bests ways to save species from extinction.
In conclusion, although some people think that zoos should be forbidden, I believe that they are worthwhile to save endangered species from extinction.
IELTS Writing Task # Essay
Some people think that zoos are cruel and all zoos should be closed. However, others think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
SAMPLE ANSWER-
All the wildlife is in a fight for survival. It is a precious gift of God to this planet which needs to be safeguarded from natural and man-made activities. Some people are of the opinion that zoos need to be banned in order to conserve extinct wildlife while others find zoos helpful in preserving rare species. From my personal standpoint, it is an urgent need to ban zoos that ill-treat wildlife for their own profitable purpose.
Zoos can be unsuitable habitats for wild animals therefore, they must be abolished. Some people consider zoos to be a cruel environment where the zoo owners camouflage their cruelty with conversation claims. Wild animals are supposed to remain in their natural habitat as in the zoos they are forced to breed or entertain the crowd, due to which they fall sick. Several wild creatures, who stay at these artificial environments do not behave like their usual counterparts. To give you an idea, polar bears can hardly walk for 5 meters when kept in a cage whereas in their Artic home they roam for hundreds of kilometers.
From another point of view, zoos provide a safe place to rehabilitate potentially lost species. Man-made activities like construction of factories by cutting down forests and hunting make wildlife’s natural habitat not a safe place to live. Many animals in zoos are well treated and live longer than they would in the wild. Like for instance, Project Tiger in India helped to conserve our national animal. Breeding programs are also practiced at zoos in order to save the endangered species.
Taking everything into account, zoos need to treat wildlife with care and stop manhandling them for entertainment purposes. Those wildlife sanctuaries and zoos that are seen mishandling wild animals should be banned immediately.
IELTS Dehradun Uttarakhand Tel: 8439000086 , 8439000087
IELTS BAND 7
tagged with Essay, writing
Zoos are famous places of recreation for all ages. Inside the zoos are different animals in makeshift habitats that have been imitated from where animals truly live in the wild. For this reason alone, many animal rights advocates call for the banning of zoos because of how it deprives animals from living lives in the wild; where they should actually be. For people who regularly go to the zoos, this is not enough reason because the zoo, as a social space, is already tightly woven to the urban dynamics of the city anchored on recreation. For them, a zoo is a park that offers more especially for families and children. With this mind, it is important to take into consideration a grey area where animal rights advocates would be able to compromise banning of the zoos into an agreement that would be more favorable to the recreational spaces of the city. In light of this, it is important to see the alternatives that are present when it comes to giving animals in the zoo a better life than the seemingly oppressive experiences they have in confined spaces.
One important to consider is the regulation of zoos and how this is done by a city’s parks and recreation department. It is a well-known fact that zoos are very confining especially for wild animals. The same goes for how being subjected to public scrutiny is an unhealthy experience for the animals. With this, it is important to open the idea that wild animals should be prevented from staying in zoos, for their own well-being. If this cannot be prevented; a more comfortable environment should be dedicated to animals in zoos. If this is not followed by zookeepers and the authorities that regulate zoos, this is when banning should be taken into consideration.
In the perspective of the public, zoos are not completely deemed as evil spaces. For children, zoos are a place of entertainment and fun where they can actual witness animals as if they are in the wild. Here is where the problem lies; awareness should also be nourished amongst children regarding the state of zoos. Through this, probably a better regulation among zoos will achieved that would be beneficial to all parties involved.
One of the main reasons why the discourse on banning zoos is still not yet talked about that much is because zoos have already established their social space and actual space within both rural and urban demographics. People perceive zoos as part of their schema: a zoo is a place that would always be readily available to them and the idea of banning zoos still seem to be a far-off idea. With this being said, the idea of banning zoos completely will never be off the table. It is true that some zoos do not treat animals fairly and these are the zoos that should be closed down in order to encourage other city zoos to not do the same.
Children’s experiences will never be complete without going to amusement park or the zoo. Maybe it’s high time to put an innovation towards the functionalities of zoos at present time. Maybe there are ways with which zoos would be friendly to both visitors and animals. Alternatives would always be welcome in order to ensure that animals in captivities are not deprived of the life they should be having. Aside from this, the process of acquiring animals should also be overseen in order to prevent any mishandling that would badly affect the state and condition of animals and zoos. Lastly, the clamor of animal rights advocates would only be called for and hopefully in the future, there would no longer be worrying about the welfare of animals in zoos.